Advocates push for micro- shelters on city owned land

Anthony Marcusa –

Following a startling survey that deemed the housing situation a “crisis,” with homelessness due to “lack of affordable housing and unmet health needs,” Toron­to is once again seeking creative short- and long-term solutions.

The city’s 2024 Street Needs Assessment homelessness sur­vey concluded that more than 15,000 people experienced homelessness in October 2024, double the number from April 2021.

“This data highlight the fail­ure of multiple systems, such as affordable housing, health care, mental health, income support, and the justice system,” the re­port states. “People are left with nowhere to turn, and the shelter system or staying outdoors be­come the last resort.”

The survey recommended as­sessing the feasibility of provid­ing micro-shelters while await­ing construction of permanent shelters.

Micro-shelters – also referred to as tiny shelters, sleeping cab­ins or pallet shelters – are small, modular pre-fabricated units that include heating and elec­tricity but no plumbing. They are envisioned as a temporary solution for those less likely to access the shelter system, par­ticularly people staying in en­campments.

In March, Ward 13 (Toronto Centre) Councillor Chris Moise voiced support for micro-shel­ters on city property in response to the housing emergency.

“Micro-shelters should be rapidly procured and installed in underutilized City-owned parking lots and land across the city,” Moise wrote. “In this ab­sence, micro-shelter type struc­tures are being placed illegally in our parks without important safety and oversight considera­tions, further frustrating efforts to clear these spaces for use by the broader public.”

The July 9 meeting of the city’s economic and community development committee heard several hours of testimony ad­vocating city-supported mi­cro-shelters as temporary hous­ing.

“Toronto must also remain open to creative, interim solu­tions such as micro-shelters and modular housing, particularly as we face urgent encampment displacement. Barriers such as zoning and land access are real, but so is the urgency to act,” Marianne Kozinets of the To­ronto Drop-In Network wrote to the committee.

Speakers representing the To­ronto Shelter Network, Ontario Nonprofit Housing Associa­tion, Right to Housing Toronto, Neighbourhood Pods TO and TTCriders also favoured such efforts.

Finding feasible locations, however, has proved problem­atic; most viable locations are sites of future shelters. “Availa­bility, size, and planned use of potential sites have emerged as the three primary constraints impacting development of a mi­cro-shelter program,” the city clerk wrote in response to Moi­se.

Some Toronto residents are pushing back against shelters in their neighbourhood.

“Community opposition has reached new heights of antag­onism,” said Leslie Gash, ex­ecutive director of the Toronto Shelter Network. A recently opened shelter on 629 Adelaide Street West has been the focus of vitriol.

“There’s been extremely har­assing behaviour. [Neighbours] are questioning anyone who leaves the shelter. They call the Ministry of Labour alleging lack of permits. They write down li­cence plate numbers and call the parking authorities. There have been verbal threats [of] physical violence.”

Police are on site “to protect the shelter from the communi­ty, not the community from the shelter,” Gash added.

Stigmatization of the un­housed and concerns about fi­nancial investments should not be normalized, one speaker em­phasized, saying better commu­nity consultation should make clear which citizens’ rights are protected, and which are not.

“You don’t actually have an inherent legal right to property values that automatically rise every year,” said Vicky Sander­son of Willowdale. “Under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, you don’t actually get to decide who lives beside you.”

Some of those supporting temporary housing suggested a name change to prevent further stigmatization.

“They’re not micro-shelters. They comprise permanent cab­ins that meet all the city stand­ards for construction and green­scape,” said John van Nostrand, senior executive of Two Steps Home. “They’re there as an in­terim use for people to move from the encampments to these sites for the three or four years it takes to approve the afforda­ble housing that has to be built at the end.”

Such temporary villages have found success in neighbouring municipalities, with speakers representing groups working in Peterborough and even Cape Breton touting accomplish­ments.

“The shelter system is very helpful for many people, but it’s not a good fit for everyone. Some people are too disruptive, while other people are vulner­able and don’t feel safe in the shelters,” said Jeff Willmer, chair of A Better Tent City in Kitchener-Waterloo.

“A tiny home’s community really provides community. It provides stability and dignity and hope. People no longer live with the threat of being asked to move along all the time. They actually have a home, a safe place to sleep, and a safe place to store their belongings.”

Ryan Donais, founder of Tiny Tiny Homes in Toronto, echoed the need for small, temporary housing. “Each person that re­sided in Tiny Tiny Homes … refused to subject themselves to the condition of the shelter system,” he said. “Each of these units provided the resident with dignity and a safe space that they needed to start working on their life.”