The Budget Committee– Density deficit

Nicki Ward –

It’s an election year. So, Toron­to’s civic budget, as in all elec­tion years is less about substance than about creating the optics that re-elect the budget-makers.

Let’s look at how the budget committee has served us in Ward 13, Toronto Centre.

The committee’s decision to take $1.7 billion from the re­serve fund has drawn criticism from all sides of the political spectrum. Those on the right have described this as “Finan­cial malpractice […] mortgaging the city’s future.” Even staunch progressives have described it as part of a series of “red flags” arguing that city reserves are not rainy-day funds or a minor accounting buffer, but money specifically set aside for bring­ing roads and infrastructure back to good repair.

This is bad for Ward 13, To­ronto Centre. We have suffered the most from over-intensifica­tion. Our density is the highest in Canada. More people, more cars, more housing per square kilometre means that our roads, sewers and transportation sys­tems wear out more quickly than anywhere else; twice as fast as our nearest neighbours, and five to ten times faster than some suburban wards.

The city’s transportation and parks are also sounding infra­structure alarm bells. There’s already a 10-year backlog of overdue repairs and the budget committee did not make adjust­ments for local density and in­tensity needs.

Other examples of the budget committee failing to address the density deficit, relate to small business and luxury off­sets. Once again, because of over-intensification, we have much higher property values per square foot than our subur­ban friends – more than twice as high in some cases. Our land value is closer to that of down­town Paris than downtown Eto­bicoke.

This means that even relative­ly small commercial properties are already too expensive or too large to access the proposed “small business” benefits. And the increased levies for high value properties are not affect­ing mega mansions, but local properties where the land val­ue is calculated on its “best and highest use” i.e., skyscrapers not strip malls.

These density deficits are pervasive in the budget com­mittee’s decisions. But, in the last stages of budget commit­tee theatre, there’s often some last-minute posturing to give the appearance of horse trading. Frankly, these are table scraps: of the total $18.9 billion in oper­ational funds, the budget com­mittee allocated $2 million for councillors to argue over.

Here’s how these pet projects were divvied up:

Ward 17 (Don Valley North): Rat Response & Coyote Strate­gy $355,000

Ward 23 (Scarborough North): Youth Innovation Hub $300,000

Ward 25 (Scarborough – Rouge Park): Complimentary Zoo School Trips $200,000

Ward 9 (Davenport): Toron­to Tenant Support Program $185,000

Ward 23 (Scarborough North): Scarborough Food Tourism Pi­lot $150,000

Ward 15 (Don Valley West): Park Rehabilitation $150,000

Ward 10 (Spadina – Fort York): Cecil Street Community Centre $100,000

Ward 3 (Etobicoke – Lake­shore): Drop-In Winter & Hy­giene Supplies $100,000

Ward 17 (Don Valley North): Seniors Housing Pest Removal Pilot $90,000

Ward 23 (Scarborough North): MyMalvern Initiative $80,000

Ward 5 (York – South West­on) Weston Community Associ­ation $75,000

Ward 14 (Toronto – Danforth): Greektown Micromobility Pilot $50,000

Ward 18 (Willowdale): Street Pole Banners – Little Iran $45,000 Ward 18

Ward 18 (Willowdale): Cana­da Day – Mel Lastman Square $35,000 Ward 18

Ward 17 Neighbourhood Cli­mate Action Grants $32,000

Ward 5 (York – South West­on) Weston Area Emergency Support $30,000

Ward 23 (Scarborough North): Brookside Theft Prevention Pi­lot $15,000

Ward 15 (Don Valley West): Thorncliffe Park Sports Associ­ation $15,000