‘A battle for the gut of the city’

Andre Bermon –

90s film tells a story of class conflict around Dundas and Sherbourne

In 1999, the British-born film­maker and CBC producer Robin Benger released a short docu­mentary movie called East Side Showdown.

The film is a human-cen­tred story depicting escalating tensions in the Dundas-Sher­bourne neighbourhood. On one side are newly established middle-class homeowners – de­termined to fight for their hard-earned investments and way of life. They square up against the long-standing urban poor of the area, who struggle to succeed in an environment rife with vio­lence and drugs.

It’s a powerful film that cap­tures a microcosm of urban conflict through the eyes of those involved. Renée, a bed-and-breakfast owner, represents the burgeoning middle-class. She leads the homeowner group against the forces of the drug and sex trade that have descend­ed upon the neighbourhood.

John Clarke of the Ontario Co­alition Against Poverty (OCAP) is Renée’s opposite. Clarke and his fellow street activists defend the poor and destitute through confrontation and often disrup­tive means.

Caught in the middle is Rever­end Jeannie Loughrey, minister at All-Saints Anglican Church. Loughrey runs a drop-in pro­gram that provides much-need­ed support to the local margin­alized population. The church is often accused of harbouring criminals and turning a blind eye to anti-social behaviour, with Loughrey herself at the centre of debates around com­munity safety.

On the sidelines is Leanna Hamel, a known prostitute and drug addict, who goes by the street name of “Angel.” Hamel plays the unceremonious third party, aligned neither to the homeowners or poverty activ­ists – she is the reminder of the human cost of the conflict. Nei­ther policy nor protest can save her.

At one point in the film the narrator says, “Here [Dundas and Sherbourne] it may be qui­et from time to time but never peace,” a line that speaks to the persistence of conflict between socio-economic classes.

Two decades later the observa­tion still holds. The four corners of Dundas and Sherbourne are in no better shape than in 1999. Layer on raging opioid epidemic and an acute housing crisis, and some would argue the situation has only worsened.

Homeowners in the Cabbage­town South neighbourhood continue to duke it out with All- Saints Church and neighbour­ing non-profit service providers. The problems are the same and the answers still fleeting.

OCAP is now defunct, but some of its members are still active. Gaetan Heroux, featured alongside Clarke in the film, now coordinates an initiative to get a plot of vacant land just south of Dundas and Sherbourne turned into social housing. The site was once occupied by rooming houses rented by low-income people. Most of the houses were later demolished but one aban­doned building still stands.

The land (214–230 Sher­bourne Street) is owned by KingSett Capital, a real estate investment trust that plans to build a high-rise condominium. The Cabbagetown South Resi­dents Association supports the proposal while Clarke, Heroux and the 230 Fightback group ob­ject, urging the city to purchase the site, or, as a last resort, ex­propriate it.

Ward 13 Councillor Chris Moise and Mayor Olivia Chow, two progressive politicians, pro­vide only lip service to their cause. There is no interest at City Hall to negotiate further with the developer (which out­bid the city for the land) or to expropriate.

At the end of the film, Renée gloats to the camera saying, “residents are winning.” Not the poor struggling in social hous­ing or the many homeless and drug addicted – she claims the homeowners and businesses have the upper hand.

A true statement then, as it is now. The future of Dundas Sherbourne may still be opaque, but the relentless force of gentri­fication will one day permeate. With more condo applications coming in fuelled by a future subway line just a stone throw away, pressure on the low-in­come community will continue to mount.

That pressure was already vis­ible in the film, which framed the conflict as a “war of val­ues”– a moral clash between two fundamentally different ways of seeing the city and what it should represent.

More than 25 years after Robin Benger’s camera cap­tured the battle at Dundas and Sherbourne, lines have barely shifted. What has changed is the scale: an opioid crisis, a wors­ening housing emergency, and condo towers pressing in from every direction.

The war of values Benger de­scribed – security versus sur­vival, property versus people – is no relic of the 1990s. It’s the question that is still being con­tested today.